My Prediction Regarding New Space Telescope That Will See Back to 100 Million Years From the Big Bang

by Sea Breeze in

a new space telescope launched a few days age that will supposedly be able to see to within 100 million years of the big bang.

wow... only 100 million years from the big bang.

that is pretty early given the 12 billion year age of the universe assigned by scholars who adhere to naturalism.

Sea Breeze

According to this paper on the Cornell University website:

"The formation and evolution of galaxies can be explained only in terms of gravitation within a inflation+dark matter+dark energy scenario."

So, how legit is galaxy formation theories when:

Inflation Theory is in serious crisis

Dark Matter was invented to make the BB Theory feasible, but it has never been observed. There is not one shred of scientific evidence that it exists

Dark Energy was invented to make the hypothetical Inflationary Period work. However, no one has ever seen it either.

If the JWST doesn't find generation III stars (which also have never been seen, but are necessary to the BB model).... then the theory has failed to predict or explain hardly anything. What else is there to debunk?

263

What Name Does the New Testament Emphasize - Jehovah or Jesus?

by Vanderhoven7 in

it seems to me scripturally speaking, that jehovah's witnesses are emphasizing the wrong name.. it should be jesus, not jehovah.

who is the way, the truth and the life?

(john 14:6).

Sea Breeze

Regarding the book: King and Messiah as Son of God: Divine, by Adela Yarbro Collins and John J. Collins.

While these scholars do confirm the belief among early Christians concerning the deity of Christ, they do reportedly wander into the weeds quite a bit.

Dr. Burer (editor for Bible.org and editor and assistant project director for the NET Bible, who also worked on the New English Translation-Novum Testamentum Graece diglot, offers these this comments on this work:

Relative to the divinity of the king of Israel, the authors are somewhat guilty of Bousset’s own history-of-religions error in making assumptions about its development. Their argument is that the belief about the divinity of the king made its way to Israel through Canaanite religion, which in turn was influenced by Egyptian religion. However, alternative views relative to this theme are not discussed (e.g., Ps. 2). Readers who disagree with this thesis might arrive at the same conclusion, but the starting point as well as the reconstruction of some of the data differs.

In addition the authors accept without debate the theory of the deuteronomist and deuteronomistic history. (Deuteronomistic History theory holds that, rather than being recorded at the times of the events themselves, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, and the books of Samuel and Kings were compiled later)

Certainly this book was not the place to debate that theory, but again readers might put the pieces of the argument together differently if this theory is not accepted.

Surprisingly the authors suggest that John 1:1c “may be translated either ‘the word was God’ or ‘the word was a god.’ ” Current scholarship is decidedly on the side of the traditional translation, giving little or no credence to the translation “the word was a god.”

263

What Name Does the New Testament Emphasize - Jehovah or Jesus?

by Vanderhoven7 in

it seems to me scripturally speaking, that jehovah's witnesses are emphasizing the wrong name.. it should be jesus, not jehovah.

who is the way, the truth and the life?

(john 14:6).

Sea Breeze

That was a very interesting video clip Riley. Thanks for posting.

36

New Light, New Light!

by BoogerMan in

more accurately known as a reversal of a long held 'truth.'.

september 2022 study watchtower - par.

14 p. 18 - "in the past, we understood jesus’ words to refer to the deeds the resurrected ones will practice after their resurrection; that is, some will come to life and practice good things while others will come to life and practice vile things.

Sea Breeze

Yes, arwen... it is incredibly sad. The WT erroneously taught for decades that a person could self atone for their sin just by dying in Romans 6: 7. They further taught that anyone who died had already paid for their sin and could then be resurrected into paradise to play with panda bears. That is apparently all gone now.

In this chapter 6 of Romans, it talks about how when a person comes to trust Christ alone, they enter into a kind of death. "They are buried with him in baptism", "our old man (personality) is crucified with him", "reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ"

The WT changed the verse to read that he that has died is acquitted of their sin. This gives the impression that some kind of trial takes place when a person dies and he gets acquitted. This of course is nonsense because if true, it would mean that Christ died for nothing.

What Romans Ch. 6 is saying is that for those who enter into the new covenant with Christ, (the one in Mt. 26:27-28 that the WT denies to its members) they are deemed to had died vicariously with Jesus on the cross. Since, only Jesus can atone for sin, he then imputes his righteousness and right to life into the believer.

Romans 6: 7 for he that has died [with Christ on the cross] is freed from sin. - KJV

The heretical idea that a person can atone for their own sin has been the ultimate hope of JW's for decades.

If you look at the statement from this pioneer sister at the end of this video, she exclaims that "our sins are forgiven when we die". It is at the 6:12 mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqwH_USEzpU&t=133s&ab_channel=BibleReady

36

New Light, New Light!

by BoogerMan in

more accurately known as a reversal of a long held 'truth.'.

september 2022 study watchtower - par.

14 p. 18 - "in the past, we understood jesus’ words to refer to the deeds the resurrected ones will practice after their resurrection; that is, some will come to life and practice good things while others will come to life and practice vile things.

Sea Breeze

He uses the past tense. He speaks of those who “did good things” and those who “practiced vile things.” This indicates that these actions took place before their death. That makes sense, does it not? After all, no one will be allowed to practice vile things in the new world. The unrighteous must have practiced these vile things before their death."

This is indeed a significant change. Too bad for all those JW's and EX-JW's who committed suicide thinking that they could pay for their own sins just by dying. Do you think the GB will apologize for lying? Even in death, JW's are still getting ripped off by the Governing Body.

This JW lady killed her whole family and left a suicide note and a video stating that she was sorry for this but it was the only way she could save her family. Her thinking was obviously based on old light.

She made a video of herself saying that she was “broken” and that she didn’t want to burden her family. She left a suicide note on the dinner table, tidied up the house, texted a relative and her husband's boss, and turned over the family photos on a secretary desk.

Then, she ended it all.

“I took my husband and kids with me so they don’t have to feel my selfish act. They will sleep until Christ resurrects them,”

Too bad she couldn't hang on until the new light came along. The WT is a deadly cult.

15

JW's everlasting life is only written in PENCIL!

by BoogerMan in

september 2022 study watchtower p.16, par.7 .

"the second group consists of the great crowd of other sheep.

are their names now written in the book of life?

Sea Breeze

Let's all rejoice in the fact that Tony Morris & Co. are already declared righteous

Exactly, that's the part they don't tell you about. They get to be sealed.... everyone else has to work for it.

But since they preach one gospel for themselves and another one for everyone else ( a message never taught by the apostles) they have a double curse waiting for them:

Galatians 1:8-9

But though* we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

They are not getting away with anything.

@Simon,

Scriptures paints a different picture. After 1000 years of peace, equality & justice, vast numbers of people simply will not want Jesus to rule over them. This is because they still have a sin nature, which is rebellious to God. So, God gives them what they want... freedom from himself.

Because of the perfect government, the age old question of nature vs. nurture will finally be answered.

263

What Name Does the New Testament Emphasize - Jehovah or Jesus?

by Vanderhoven7 in

it seems to me scripturally speaking, that jehovah's witnesses are emphasizing the wrong name.. it should be jesus, not jehovah.

who is the way, the truth and the life?

(john 14:6).

Sea Breeze

@TruthBKnown

Prior to Paul appointing himself as an Apostle and breaking ways with the Jewish followers of Jesus in Jerusalem

Right off the bat we got a problem. Scripture says that the other apostles accepted Paul as an apostle, they "added nothing" to his teachings, and they "gave him the right had of fellowship".

Galatians 2

Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with me also.

2 And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, ...

7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;

8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)

9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.

Scripture says they were all preaching the same message and were in agreement. Peter, James and John, the big three gave him their blessing and "added nothing to my message" - Gal. 2: 6 NIV

Jehovah's Witnesses are obsessed with the earliest form worship that the followers of Jesus had. They were basically practicing Jews who also accepted Jesus' teachings. They still celebrated the Jewish festivals and went to the temple. That is why they were hated by the Sadducees, and Pharisees. It was their job to keep Judaism pure and free from non-Judaic religious belief or practice. Jehovah's Witnesses are an offshoot of that early, brief period that existed shortly after Jesus death.

I tend to agree with this. I would probably state it a little differently. JW's are obsessed with living in the prior dispensation (age of law) and the future dispensation (Millennium age) and do not live in the age we are now in... the age of grace.

263

What Name Does the New Testament Emphasize - Jehovah or Jesus?

by Vanderhoven7 in

it seems to me scripturally speaking, that jehovah's witnesses are emphasizing the wrong name.. it should be jesus, not jehovah.

who is the way, the truth and the life?

(john 14:6).

Sea Breeze

Yes SB "you can say" but the bible doesn't say and we know what says in the bible about those who adds words to it.

GB - What on earth are you talking about? The scriptures cited (the ones you ignored) form the basis of why we can say that God raised Jesus from the dead BECAUSE THE BIBLE SAYS THAT HE DID!

The Bible indicates that all three Persons of the Trinity were involved in Jesus’ resurrection. Galatians 1:1 says that the Father raised Jesus from the dead. First Peter 3:18 says that the Spirit raised Jesus from the dead (see also Romans 1:4, and note that Romans 8:11 clearly says that God will resurrect believers “through His Spirit”). And in John 2:19 Jesus predicts that He will raise Himself from the dead (see also John 10:18). So, when we answer the question of who resurrected Jesus, we can say God did.

the one whom God raised from the dead, a fact to which we are witnesses. - Acts 3: 15

So scripture says that :

1. Jesus claimed that he would raise himself from the dead

2. The Father would raise Jesus from the dead

3. The Spirit would raise Jesus and believers from the dead

4. God raised Jesus from the dead.

So which one did it? The answer is yes.

263

What Name Does the New Testament Emphasize - Jehovah or Jesus?

by Vanderhoven7 in

it seems to me scripturally speaking, that jehovah's witnesses are emphasizing the wrong name.. it should be jesus, not jehovah.

who is the way, the truth and the life?

(john 14:6).

Sea Breeze

Jesus is only a fellow creature.

@Fisherman - That is simply a lie. I can't help but to be so blunt sometimes. But, it is a WT lie.

All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. John 1: 3

Jesus is the Creator of everything ever created.

Here's some more scriptures for you to consider - Jesus is called the EVERLASTING FATHER in Is. 9:6

“For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.”

And....

“I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End,” says the Lord, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.” (Revelation 1:8)

I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. (Revelation 22:13)

And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he (Jesus) laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not; I am the first and the last: (Revelation 1:17)

Even his enemies (hostile testimony) hated him for what he claimed:

The Jews answered Him, “We are not stoning You for a good work, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, claim to be God.” - John 10:33

Micah 5: 2 states that Jesus, the future King of Israel had no beginning:

But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.

Jesus is uncreated according to Scripture. Can you see how before the WT came along, that people would think this just by reading scripture?

263

What Name Does the New Testament Emphasize - Jehovah or Jesus?

by Vanderhoven7 in

it seems to me scripturally speaking, that jehovah's witnesses are emphasizing the wrong name.. it should be jesus, not jehovah.

who is the way, the truth and the life?

(john 14:6).

Sea Breeze

I’m interested in what the New Testament says for its own sake. Having considered it a lot, I have come to the view that Jesus himself would have been astounded that others equated him with God.

SBF, I couldn't help but notice that you did not provide any scriptural references to support your "view".

His earliest followers viewed him as a messenger from God

Sure, like is own brothers who didn't believe him "early" on? (John 7: 5)

Why would you identify with people "early" in Jesus ministry and not those "later" in his ministry that witnessed his resurrection and viewed him as God?

"And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God."

The Bible indicates that all three Persons of the Trinity were involved in Jesus’ resurrection. Galatians 1:1 says that the Father raised Jesus from the dead. First Peter 3:18 says that the Spirit raised Jesus from the dead (see also Romans 1:4, and note that Romans 8:11 clearly says that God will resurrect believers “through His Spirit”). And in John 2:19 Jesus predicts that He will raise Himself from the dead (see also John 10:18). So, when we answer the question of who resurrected Jesus, we can say God did. And by that we can mean it was the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

This has been bedrock Christian doctrine for 2000 years. Would you like to see references from the "early" church leaders, some personally trained by the apostles who often spoke of Jesus as God. I've got plenty of those references too.

Sea Breeze

Posts by Sea Breeze

Galatians 1:8-9